Ball one indicated by the attached graphic ushered in a new era in professional baseball (I surmise the Atlantic League's prior ABS use was deemed irregular or somewhat of a beta test, whereas the league put out a press release announcing Thursday, July 25 as a "landmark day for the Atlantic League and professional baseball," according to ALPB President Rick White.
ALPB also apparently changed the strike zone, or at least its computer definition. According to a local reporter covering Lancaster, PA's team, under ABS, "vertically, a pitch has to be completely within the strikezone [sic] to be called a strike. Horizontally, a pitch only needs to be partially in the zone."
Frank Viola's dispute from July 12, 2019. |
Ball One at High Point: The first pitch of the game to Sugar Land Skeeters batter Rico Noel from High Point Rockers pitcher Michael Bowden was ruled ball one by ABS, despite the ball appearing on ALPB gameday-style graphics to be partially within the illustrative strike zone. Despite the aforementioned ABS strike zone definition, this graphic indicated that Pitch #1 was located entirely within the graphic's vertical strike zone, but only partially within the horizontal zone, not that we haven't dealt with this problem before.
Related Post: Reviewing Atlantic League's Automated Strike Zone (7/11/19).
At least Frank Viola's ejection a fortnight prior regarding ABS-visualization incongruence waited until the bottom of the 1st inning...
Related Post: History - Baseball's First Ejection Due to TrackMan (7/12/19).
When in doubt, just blame TrackMan! |
Gil's Call: This could be an excellent PR hedge by MLB/ALPB. If ABS underwhelms, divesting from TrackMan early and often makes it easier for MLB/ALPB to blame/scapegoat/invoke TrackMan as the problem, which would in turn make it easier for the league(s) to ditch TrackMan and institute a technology like Hawk-Eye, presumably telling the public the switch would be for the purposes of accuracy or some similar technological development reason. Put a pin in this thought for now; we might pick it up again in the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment